Perencanaan Arsitektur Enterprise SI/TI pada SMA Negeri 1 Purwoasri Kediri menggunakan Kerangka TOGAF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35746/jtim.v7i3.765Kata Kunci:
Enterprise Architecture, TOGAF ADM, Digital Transformation, Education, EA-CMMAbstrak
Digital transformation in the education sector requires institutions such as SMA Negeri 1 Purwoasri Kediri to adopt a structured and strategic approach in managing Information Systems and Information Technology (IS/IT). Fragmented systems, duplicated data, and inefficient services have become major challenges that hinder optimal performance and service delivery. This study aims to design an Enterprise Architecture (EA) using the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) framework to address these issues comprehensively. The research method combines observation, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), and a structured analysis through TOGAF ADM phases—Preliminary, Architecture Vision, Business Architecture, Information Systems Architecture, and Technology Architecture. An evaluation of the institution’s current IS/IT condition was conducted using the EA Capability Maturity Model (EA-CMM) Scorecard. The results indicate that the school has a relatively strong foundation in IT governance (level 4/Managed), but still shows limitations in methodology usage, supporting tools, and human resource competencies, with an average score of 2.71 (Under Development). Business process mapping identified several priority systems, including student admission (PPDB), e-report cards, and digital libraries, alongside supporting systems such as inventory and asset management. The overall system effectiveness rate is 72.5%, these findings align with previous studies highlighting the urgency of integrated systems in schools. The study provides practical implications, including recommendations for phased implementation of EA, continuous training for human resources, and the development of an embedded EA model tailored to the needs and conditions of secondary educational institutions, ensuring sustainability and adaptability in the long term.
Unduhan
Referensi
K. Striteska and V. Prokop, “Dynamic innovation strategy model in practice of innovation leaders and followers in cee countries-a prerequisite for building innovative ecosystems,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093918.
J. J. Yun and X. Zhao, “Business model innovation through a rectangular compass: From the perspective of open innovation with mechanism design,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040131.
N. R. Busch and A. Zalewski, “A Systematic Literature Review of Enterprise Architecture Evaluation Methods,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, no. 5, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1145/3706582.
S. AlMuhayfith and H. Shaiti, “The impact of enterprise resource planning on business performance: With the discussion on its relationship with open innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 6, no. 3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030087.
B. Gobin-Rahimbux et al., “A Systematic Literature Review on ICT Architectures for Smart Mauritian Local Council,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 261–281, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2019-0062.
D. N. Adi Sista, I. M. Candiasa, and I. G. Aris Gunadi, “Perancangan Arsitektur Enterprise Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Togaf Adm Di Sma Negeri 1 Singaraja,” JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 316–328, 2021, https://doi.org/10.23887/jstundiksha.v10i2.37137.
A. Dorofeev, N. Altukhova, N. Filippova, T. Pashkova, and M. Ponomarev, “Development of transportation management system with the use of ontological and architectural approaches to ensure trucking reliability,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 1–16, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208504.
R. van de Wetering, S. Kurnia, and S. Kotusev, “The role of enterprise architecture for digital transformations,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042237.
Y. Prasetyo, “Perencanaan Arsitektur Enterprise Smart School Menggunakan Togaf: Studi Kasus SMK Negeri 13 Bandung,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–30, 2021, https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/12885.
B. G. Sudarsono, J. F. Andry, P. Ranting, and A. B. A. Rahman, “Redesign the forwarding company’s business processes using the zachman framework,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 98, no. 16, pp. 3222–3232, 2020. http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol98No16/4Vol98No16.pdf
U. Ulmi, A. P. G. Putra, Y. D. P. Ginting, I. L. Laily, F. Humani, and Y. Ruldeviyani, “Enterprise Architecture Planning for Enterprise University Information System Using the TOGAF Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 879, no. 1, 2020, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012073.
B. Anthony Jnr, “Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture–a review and research agenda,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 299–331, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1812006.
K. R. Putra and F. Anggreani, “Perancangan Arsitektur Enterprise Pada Instansi Pemerintahan: Systematic Literature Review,” Comput. Educ. Technol. J., vol. 2, no. November, pp. 10–25, 2022, https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journals/index.php/cetj/article/view/5293.
S. S. Hilabi, F. L. Gaol, and T. Matsuo, “Enterprise architecture design for regional parliament information systems using the standard government and architecture application (SAGA) framework,” ICIC Express Lett., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 2021, http://www.icicel.org/ell/contents/2021/2/el-15-02-09.pdf.
H. Supriyadi and E. Amalia, “Development of enterprise architecture in senior high school using TOGAF as framewrok,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 8–14, 2019, https://www.hrpub.org/download/20190430/UJER2-19590541.pdf.
C. Wohlin, E. Mendes, K. R. Felizardo, and M. Kalinowski, “Guidelines for the search strategy to update systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 127, no. January, p. 106366, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106366.
E. Gökalp and V. Martinez, “Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers,” Comput. Ind., vol. 132, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103522.
F. Rani Oktavia, E. Rasywir, and L. Aryani, “Perencanaan Arsitektur Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Togaf Adm Pada Kantor Desa Simpang Terusan Dengan Evaluasi Ea-Scorecard,” J. Manaj. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 667–679, 2024, https://doi.org/10.33998/jms.2024.4.1.1715.
S. Ananda Putri, Jasmir, and S. Rianti, “Perencanaan Arsitektur Enterprise Sistem Informasi Menggunakan TOGAF ADM Pada SMA Pelita Raya Jambi,” J. Inform. Dan Rekayasa Komputer(JAKAKOM), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 459–469, 2023, https://doi.org/10.33998/jakakom.2023.3.1.803.
S. Alamri, M. Abdullah, and A. Albar, “Enterprise architecture adoption for higher education institutions,” Int. J. Simul. Syst. Sci. Technol., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 16.1-16.8, 2018, https://ijssst.info/Vol-19/No-5/paper16.pdf.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Mohammad Haris Muzakki, Alva Hendi Muhammad
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
