Analisis Korelasi Faktor-Faktor Penentu Produktivitas dalam Skema Remote Work Menggunakan Pendekatan Visualisasi dan Statistik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35746/jtim.v7i3.739Keywords:
Remote Work, Productivity, Pearson Correlation, Data Visualization, Survey DataAbstract
The massive shift in work patterns caused by the global pandemic has significantly accelerated the adoption of remote work schemes across various industries and organizations. This condition has created a strong need for data-driven studies to understand the factors that influence employee productivity in flexible work environments. This study aims to analyze the relationships among several key variables, namely employment type (in-office or remote), weekly working hours, and well-being score, in relation to individual productivity scores. The research data were obtained from a publicly available dataset on the Kaggle platform, containing 1,000 entries from respondents with diverse professional backgrounds. The analysis process involved data preprocessing, Pearson correlation analysis, and exploratory data visualization using heatmaps and scatter plots to facilitate result interpretation. The results show that remote work is positively correlated with productivity (r = 0.40), while weekly working hours exhibit a negative correlation (r = -0.25). Meanwhile, the well-being score demonstrates a weak but positive correlation with productivity (r = 0.14). The data visualizations support these numerical findings by presenting consistent patterns among the analyzed variables. These findings offer preliminary insights that are valuable for future studies related to remote work productivity. This study can serve as an initial reference for decision-makers in designing data-driven policies to optimize flexible work arrangements.
Downloads
References
N. Bloom, J. Liang, J. Roberts, and Z. J. Ying, “Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 165–218, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032.
A. Choudhury, B. Larson, and C. Foroughi, “Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility,” Strateg. Manage. J., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 655–683, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251.
E. L. Hill, A. J. Hawkins, M. Ferris, and M. Weitzman, “Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life,” Fam. Relat., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00049.x.
A. S. Gajendran and D. A. Harrison, “The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psy-chological mediators and individual consequences,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1524–1541, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.
M. R. Turetken, Y. Jain, J. Quesenberry, and D. E. Sawyer, “The impact of ICT on work: Opportunities and challenges for teleworking,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 516–530, 2011.
J. M. Olson and S. Primps, “Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues,” J. Soc. Issues, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 97–112, 1993, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb00194.x.
T. D. Allen, R. C. Johnson, K. M. Kiburz, and K. M. Shockley, “Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 345–376, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012.
A. F. T. Winardi, M. A. Wibowo, and B. Susanto, “Data visualization dashboard for remote work monitoring using business intelligence,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1196, 2019, Art. no. 012037, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1196/1/012037.
A. C. Ghosh and M. Varshney, “Using heat maps for understanding employee productivity patterns in remote settings,” in Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction, 2014, pp. 155–160, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2_24.
R. B. Freeman and J. Rogers, “A proposal to American employers: Adopt high-performance work practices,” Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 1999.
K. M. Podsakoff, P. M. Podsakoff, and N. P. R. Dalal, “Survey methods in organizational research,” in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 208–230.
A. R. Connell and C. P. Gollan, “Data cleaning techniques for improving quality in organizational research,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 197–210, 2010.
T. Oliphant, “Python for data analysis,” Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 14–20, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.36.
J. Tukey, Exploratory Data Analysis, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
J. Benesty, J. Chen, Y. Huang, and I. Cohen, “Pearson correlation coefficient,” in Noise Reduction in Speech Processing, Springer, 2009, pp. 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5.
S. Few, Information Dashboard Design: The Effective Visual Communication of Data, 2nd ed. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, 2013.
J. Heer and B. Shneiderman, “Interactive dynamics for visual analysis,” Commun. ACM, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 45–54, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133821.
A. Abdelstar, “Remote Work Productivity,” Kaggle, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/code/alaaabdelstar/remote-work-productivity. [Accessed: Jan. 8, 2025].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dwi Nur Chasanah, Rosidi Rosidi, M. Abdul Jamal Nasir, Mukhamad Angga Gumilang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
